PLEASE FEED THE GODDESS!
Goddess Praise
- "Dear Echidne, I read your blog all the time! I love it."
- Katha Pollitt, the Nation
Links
- Alas, A Blog
- Alternet
- And Another Thing
- Angry Black Bitch
- Best of Both Worlds
- Blog Sisters
- Bouphonia
- Broadsheet
- Crooks and Liars
- Daddy Dialectic
- Daily Politics Blog
- Dependable Renegade
- Devil's Dictionary Defiled
- Donna's Place
- Eschaton
- Ezra Klein
- Fact-esque, A Reality-Based Blog
- the f-word
- Feminist Blogs
- Feminist Campus
- Feminist Law Professors
- Feministe
- Feministing.com
- First Draft
- Focal Point (was Majikthise)
- Frogblog
- Glenn Greenwald
- Hecate
- Hello Ladies
- Hollaback
- Hullabaloo (Digby)
- I Blame The Patriarchy
- Informed Comment
- James Wolcott
- Jesus' General
- Katha Pollitt Dot Com
- Kathryn Cramer
- Laura, 11D
- Lance Mannion
- Lawyers, Guns and Money
- The Left Coaster
- Liberal Oasis
- Liberty Street
- Manboobz.com
- Matthew Yglesias
- Multi Medium
- olvlzl
- Orcinus
- Pam's House Blend
- Pandagon
- Pen-Elayne on the Web
- Pensito Review
- Pharyngula
- Prof. Wombat:Second Opinion
- Prometheus6
- Racialicious
- The Ranting Teenager
- Raw Story
- The Reaction
- RH Reality Check
- Rising Hegemon
- Roger Ailes
- The Rude Pundit
- Shakespeare's Sister
- skippy the bush kangaroo
- slacktivist
- Spocko's Brain
- Steve Bates
- Suburban Guerrilla
- TalkLeft
- TAPPED
- TBogg
- Think Progress
- Welcome to the Sideshow (Avedon)
- Whiskey Fire
- CLICK HERE TO DONATE: PLEASE FEED THE GODDESS!
Archives
- 11/2/03 - 11/9/03
- 11/9/03 - 11/16/03
- 11/16/03 - 11/23/03
- 11/23/03 - 11/30/03
- 11/30/03 - 12/7/03
- 12/7/03 - 12/14/03
- 12/14/03 - 12/21/03
- 12/21/03 - 12/28/03
- 12/28/03 - 1/4/04
- 1/4/04 - 1/11/04
- 1/11/04 - 1/18/04
- 1/18/04 - 1/25/04
- 1/25/04 - 2/1/04
- 2/1/04 - 2/8/04
- 2/8/04 - 2/15/04
- 2/15/04 - 2/22/04
- 2/22/04 - 2/29/04
- 2/29/04 - 3/7/04
- 3/7/04 - 3/14/04
- 3/14/04 - 3/21/04
- 3/21/04 - 3/28/04
- 3/28/04 - 4/4/04
- 4/4/04 - 4/11/04
- 4/11/04 - 4/18/04
- 4/18/04 - 4/25/04
- 4/25/04 - 5/2/04
- 5/2/04 - 5/9/04
- 5/9/04 - 5/16/04
- 5/16/04 - 5/23/04
- 5/23/04 - 5/30/04
- 5/30/04 - 6/6/04
- 6/6/04 - 6/13/04
- 6/13/04 - 6/20/04
- 6/20/04 - 6/27/04
- 6/27/04 - 7/4/04
- 7/4/04 - 7/11/04
- 7/11/04 - 7/18/04
- 7/18/04 - 7/25/04
- 7/25/04 - 8/1/04
- 8/1/04 - 8/8/04
- 8/8/04 - 8/15/04
- 8/15/04 - 8/22/04
- 8/22/04 - 8/29/04
- 8/29/04 - 9/5/04
- 9/5/04 - 9/12/04
- 9/12/04 - 9/19/04
- 9/19/04 - 9/26/04
- 9/26/04 - 10/3/04
- 10/3/04 - 10/10/04
- 10/10/04 - 10/17/04
- 10/17/04 - 10/24/04
- 10/24/04 - 10/31/04
- 10/31/04 - 11/7/04
- 11/7/04 - 11/14/04
- 11/14/04 - 11/21/04
- 11/21/04 - 11/28/04
- 11/28/04 - 12/5/04
- 12/5/04 - 12/12/04
- 12/12/04 - 12/19/04
- 12/19/04 - 12/26/04
- 12/26/04 - 1/2/05
- 1/2/05 - 1/9/05
- 1/9/05 - 1/16/05
- 1/16/05 - 1/23/05
- 1/23/05 - 1/30/05
- 1/30/05 - 2/6/05
- 2/6/05 - 2/13/05
- 2/13/05 - 2/20/05
- 2/20/05 - 2/27/05
- 2/27/05 - 3/6/05
- 3/6/05 - 3/13/05
- 3/13/05 - 3/20/05
- 3/20/05 - 3/27/05
- 3/27/05 - 4/3/05
- 4/3/05 - 4/10/05
- 4/10/05 - 4/17/05
- 4/17/05 - 4/24/05
- 4/24/05 - 5/1/05
- 5/1/05 - 5/8/05
- 5/8/05 - 5/15/05
- 5/15/05 - 5/22/05
- 5/22/05 - 5/29/05
- 5/29/05 - 6/5/05
- 6/5/05 - 6/12/05
- 6/12/05 - 6/19/05
- 6/19/05 - 6/26/05
- 6/26/05 - 7/3/05
- 7/3/05 - 7/10/05
- 7/10/05 - 7/17/05
- 7/17/05 - 7/24/05
- 7/24/05 - 7/31/05
- 7/31/05 - 8/7/05
- 8/7/05 - 8/14/05
- 8/14/05 - 8/21/05
- 8/21/05 - 8/28/05
- 8/28/05 - 9/4/05
- 9/4/05 - 9/11/05
- 9/11/05 - 9/18/05
- 9/18/05 - 9/25/05
- 9/25/05 - 10/2/05
- 10/2/05 - 10/9/05
- 10/9/05 - 10/16/05
- 10/16/05 - 10/23/05
- 10/23/05 - 10/30/05
- 10/30/05 - 11/6/05
- 11/6/05 - 11/13/05
- 11/13/05 - 11/20/05
- 11/20/05 - 11/27/05
- 11/27/05 - 12/4/05
- 12/4/05 - 12/11/05
- 12/11/05 - 12/18/05
- 12/18/05 - 12/25/05
- 12/25/05 - 1/1/06
- 1/1/06 - 1/8/06
- 1/8/06 - 1/15/06
- 1/15/06 - 1/22/06
- 1/22/06 - 1/29/06
- 1/29/06 - 2/5/06
- 2/5/06 - 2/12/06
- 2/12/06 - 2/19/06
- 2/19/06 - 2/26/06
- 2/26/06 - 3/5/06
- 3/5/06 - 3/12/06
- 3/12/06 - 3/19/06
- 3/19/06 - 3/26/06
- 3/26/06 - 4/2/06
- 4/2/06 - 4/9/06
- 4/9/06 - 4/16/06
- 4/16/06 - 4/23/06
- 4/23/06 - 4/30/06
- 4/30/06 - 5/7/06
- 5/7/06 - 5/14/06
- 5/14/06 - 5/21/06
- 5/21/06 - 5/28/06
- 5/28/06 - 6/4/06
- 6/4/06 - 6/11/06
- 6/11/06 - 6/18/06
- 6/18/06 - 6/25/06
- 6/25/06 - 7/2/06
- 7/2/06 - 7/9/06
- 7/9/06 - 7/16/06
- 7/16/06 - 7/23/06
- 7/23/06 - 7/30/06
- 7/30/06 - 8/6/06
- 8/6/06 - 8/13/06
- 8/13/06 - 8/20/06
- 8/20/06 - 8/27/06
- 8/27/06 - 9/3/06
- 9/3/06 - 9/10/06
- 9/10/06 - 9/17/06
- 9/17/06 - 9/24/06
- 9/24/06 - 10/1/06
- 10/1/06 - 10/8/06
- 10/8/06 - 10/15/06
- 10/15/06 - 10/22/06
- 10/22/06 - 10/29/06
- 10/29/06 - 11/5/06
- 11/5/06 - 11/12/06
- 11/12/06 - 11/19/06
- 11/19/06 - 11/26/06
- 11/26/06 - 12/3/06
- 12/3/06 - 12/10/06
- 12/10/06 - 12/17/06
- 12/17/06 - 12/24/06
- 12/24/06 - 12/31/06
- 12/31/06 - 1/7/07
- 1/7/07 - 1/14/07
- 1/14/07 - 1/21/07
- 1/21/07 - 1/28/07
- 1/28/07 - 2/4/07
- 2/4/07 - 2/11/07
- 2/11/07 - 2/18/07
- 2/18/07 - 2/25/07
- 2/25/07 - 3/4/07
- 3/4/07 - 3/11/07
- 3/11/07 - 3/18/07
- 3/18/07 - 3/25/07
- 3/25/07 - 4/1/07
- 4/1/07 - 4/8/07
- 4/8/07 - 4/15/07
- 4/15/07 - 4/22/07
- 4/22/07 - 4/29/07
- 4/29/07 - 5/6/07
- 5/6/07 - 5/13/07
- 5/13/07 - 5/20/07
- 5/20/07 - 5/27/07
- 5/27/07 - 6/3/07
- 6/3/07 - 6/10/07
- 6/10/07 - 6/17/07
- 6/17/07 - 6/24/07
- 6/24/07 - 7/1/07
- 7/1/07 - 7/8/07
- 7/8/07 - 7/15/07
- 7/15/07 - 7/22/07
- 7/22/07 - 7/29/07
- 7/29/07 - 8/5/07
- 8/5/07 - 8/12/07
- 8/12/07 - 8/19/07
- 8/19/07 - 8/26/07
- 8/26/07 - 9/2/07
- 9/2/07 - 9/9/07
- 9/9/07 - 9/16/07
- 9/16/07 - 9/23/07
- 9/23/07 - 9/30/07
- 9/30/07 - 10/7/07
- 10/7/07 - 10/14/07
- 10/14/07 - 10/21/07
- 10/21/07 - 10/28/07
- 10/28/07 - 11/4/07
- 11/4/07 - 11/11/07
- 11/11/07 - 11/18/07
- 11/18/07 - 11/25/07
- 11/25/07 - 12/2/07
- 12/2/07 - 12/9/07
- 12/9/07 - 12/16/07
- 12/16/07 - 12/23/07
- 12/23/07 - 12/30/07
- 12/30/07 - 1/6/08
- 1/6/08 - 1/13/08
- 1/13/08 - 1/20/08
- 1/20/08 - 1/27/08
- 1/27/08 - 2/3/08
- 2/3/08 - 2/10/08
- 2/10/08 - 2/17/08
- 2/17/08 - 2/24/08
- 2/24/08 - 3/2/08
- 3/2/08 - 3/9/08
- 3/9/08 - 3/16/08
- 3/16/08 - 3/23/08
- 3/23/08 - 3/30/08
- 3/30/08 - 4/6/08
- 4/6/08 - 4/13/08
- 4/13/08 - 4/20/08
- 4/20/08 - 4/27/08
- 4/27/08 - 5/4/08
- 5/4/08 - 5/11/08
- 5/11/08 - 5/18/08
- 5/18/08 - 5/25/08
- 5/25/08 - 6/1/08
- 6/1/08 - 6/8/08
- 6/8/08 - 6/15/08
- 6/15/08 - 6/22/08
- 6/22/08 - 6/29/08
- 6/29/08 - 7/6/08
- 7/6/08 - 7/13/08
- 7/13/08 - 7/20/08
- 7/20/08 - 7/27/08
- 7/27/08 - 8/3/08
- 8/3/08 - 8/10/08
- 8/10/08 - 8/17/08
- 8/17/08 - 8/24/08
- 8/24/08 - 8/31/08
- 8/31/08 - 9/7/08
- 9/7/08 - 9/14/08
- 9/14/08 - 9/21/08
- 9/21/08 - 9/28/08
- 9/28/08 - 10/5/08
- 10/5/08 - 10/12/08
- 10/12/08 - 10/19/08
- 10/19/08 - 10/26/08
- 10/26/08 - 11/2/08
- 11/2/08 - 11/9/08
- 11/9/08 - 11/16/08
- 11/16/08 - 11/23/08
- 11/23/08 - 11/30/08
- 11/30/08 - 12/7/08
- 12/7/08 - 12/14/08
- 12/14/08 - 12/21/08
- 12/21/08 - 12/28/08
- 12/28/08 - 1/4/09
- 1/4/09 - 1/11/09
- 1/11/09 - 1/18/09
- 1/18/09 - 1/25/09
- 1/25/09 - 2/1/09
- 2/1/09 - 2/8/09
- 2/8/09 - 2/15/09
- 2/15/09 - 2/22/09
- 2/22/09 - 3/1/09
- 3/1/09 - 3/8/09
- 3/8/09 - 3/15/09
- 3/15/09 - 3/22/09
- 3/22/09 - 3/29/09
- 3/29/09 - 4/5/09
- 4/5/09 - 4/12/09
- 4/12/09 - 4/19/09
- 4/19/09 - 4/26/09
- 4/26/09 - 5/3/09
- 5/3/09 - 5/10/09
- 5/10/09 - 5/17/09
- 5/17/09 - 5/24/09
- 5/24/09 - 5/31/09
- 5/31/09 - 6/7/09
- 6/7/09 - 6/14/09
- 6/14/09 - 6/21/09
- 6/21/09 - 6/28/09
- 6/28/09 - 7/5/09
- 7/5/09 - 7/12/09
- 7/12/09 - 7/19/09
- 7/19/09 - 7/26/09
- 7/26/09 - 8/2/09
- 8/2/09 - 8/9/09
- 8/9/09 - 8/16/09
- 8/16/09 - 8/23/09
- 8/23/09 - 8/30/09
- 8/30/09 - 9/6/09
- 9/6/09 - 9/13/09
- 9/13/09 - 9/20/09
- 9/20/09 - 9/27/09
- 9/27/09 - 10/4/09
- 10/4/09 - 10/11/09
- 10/11/09 - 10/18/09
- 10/18/09 - 10/25/09
- 10/25/09 - 11/1/09
- 11/1/09 - 11/8/09
- 11/8/09 - 11/15/09
- 11/15/09 - 11/22/09
- 11/22/09 - 11/29/09
- 11/29/09 - 12/6/09
- 12/6/09 - 12/13/09
- 12/13/09 - 12/20/09
- 12/20/09 - 12/27/09
- 12/27/09 - 1/3/10
- 1/3/10 - 1/10/10
- 1/10/10 - 1/17/10
- 1/17/10 - 1/24/10
- 1/24/10 - 1/31/10
- 1/31/10 - 2/7/10
- 2/7/10 - 2/14/10
- 2/14/10 - 2/21/10
- 2/21/10 - 2/28/10
- 2/28/10 - 3/7/10
- 3/7/10 - 3/14/10
- 3/14/10 - 3/21/10
- 3/21/10 - 3/28/10
- 3/28/10 - 4/4/10
- 4/4/10 - 4/11/10
- 4/11/10 - 4/18/10
- 4/18/10 - 4/25/10
- 4/25/10 - 5/2/10
- 5/2/10 - 5/9/10
- 5/9/10 - 5/16/10
- 5/16/10 - 5/23/10
- 5/23/10 - 5/30/10
- 5/30/10 - 6/6/10
- 6/6/10 - 6/13/10
- 6/13/10 - 6/20/10
- 6/20/10 - 6/27/10
- 6/27/10 - 7/4/10
- 7/4/10 - 7/11/10
- 7/11/10 - 7/18/10
- 7/18/10 - 7/25/10
- 7/25/10 - 8/1/10
- 8/1/10 - 8/8/10
- 8/8/10 - 8/15/10
- 8/15/10 - 8/22/10
- 8/22/10 - 8/29/10
- 8/29/10 - 9/5/10
- 9/5/10 - 9/12/10
- 9/12/10 - 9/19/10
- 9/19/10 - 9/26/10
- 9/26/10 - 10/3/10
- 10/3/10 - 10/10/10
- 10/10/10 - 10/17/10
- 10/17/10 - 10/24/10
- 10/24/10 - 10/31/10
- 10/31/10 - 11/7/10
- 11/7/10 - 11/14/10
- 11/14/10 - 11/21/10
- 11/21/10 - 11/28/10
- 11/28/10 - 12/5/10
- 12/5/10 - 12/12/10
- 12/12/10 - 12/19/10
- 12/19/10 - 12/26/10
- 12/26/10 - 1/2/11
- 1/2/11 - 1/9/11
- 1/9/11 - 1/16/11
- 1/16/11 - 1/23/11
- 1/23/11 - 1/30/11
- 1/30/11 - 2/6/11
- 2/6/11 - 2/13/11
- 2/13/11 - 2/20/11
- 2/20/11 - 2/27/11
- 2/27/11 - 3/6/11
- 3/6/11 - 3/13/11
- 3/13/11 - 3/20/11
- 3/20/11 - 3/27/11
- 3/27/11 - 4/3/11
- 4/3/11 - 4/10/11
- 4/10/11 - 4/17/11
- 4/17/11 - 4/24/11
- 4/24/11 - 5/1/11
- 5/1/11 - 5/8/11
- 5/8/11 - 5/15/11
- 5/15/11 - 5/22/11
- 5/22/11 - 5/29/11
- 5/29/11 - 6/5/11
- 6/5/11 - 6/12/11
- 6/12/11 - 6/19/11
- 6/19/11 - 6/26/11
- 6/26/11 - 7/3/11
- 7/3/11 - 7/10/11
- 7/10/11 - 7/17/11
- 7/17/11 - 7/24/11
- 7/24/11 - 7/31/11
- 7/31/11 - 8/7/11
- 8/7/11 - 8/14/11
- 8/14/11 - 8/21/11
- 8/21/11 - 8/28/11
- 8/28/11 - 9/4/11
- 9/4/11 - 9/11/11
- 9/11/11 - 9/18/11
- 9/18/11 - 9/25/11
- 9/25/11 - 10/2/11
- 10/2/11 - 10/9/11
- 10/9/11 - 10/16/11
- 10/16/11 - 10/23/11
- 10/23/11 - 10/30/11
- 10/30/11 - 11/6/11
- 11/6/11 - 11/13/11
- 11/13/11 - 11/20/11
- 11/20/11 - 11/27/11
- 11/27/11 - 12/4/11
- 12/4/11 - 12/11/11
- 12/11/11 - 12/18/11
- 12/18/11 - 12/25/11
- 12/25/11 - 1/1/12
- 1/1/12 - 1/8/12
- 1/8/12 - 1/15/12
- 1/15/12 - 1/22/12
- 1/22/12 - 1/29/12
- 1/29/12 - 2/5/12
- 2/5/12 - 2/12/12
- 2/12/12 - 2/19/12
- 2/19/12 - 2/26/12
- 2/26/12 - 3/4/12
- 3/4/12 - 3/11/12
- 3/11/12 - 3/18/12
- 3/18/12 - 3/25/12
- 3/25/12 - 4/1/12
- 4/1/12 - 4/8/12
- 4/8/12 - 4/15/12
- 4/15/12 - 4/22/12
- 4/22/12 - 4/29/12
- 4/29/12 - 5/6/12
- 5/6/12 - 5/13/12
- 5/13/12 - 5/20/12
- 5/20/12 - 5/27/12
- 5/27/12 - 6/3/12
Powered by
RSSify at WCC
ATOM Feed
OPINIONS OF ECHIDNE OF THE SNAKES,
A MINOR GREEK GODDESS.
She can be reached at:
ECHIDNE-OF-THE-SNAKES.COM
Saturday, May 07, 2005
Happy Mothers' Day!
Time to celebrate all the mothers, right? Well, the Office of the Surgeon General has slightly different ideas about what is suitable for this weekend. Richard D. Carmona believes that this is a very good opportunity to remind mothers of their Holy Duties! You know, to tell mothers how it is their responsibility and obligation to make sure that the fetus and then the baby is going to be healthy. What else could the Mothers' Day possibly be for than a little extra space and time for adding to what some call the mothering guilt? Dr. Carmona gives the mothers of America this:
So now you know one possible speech topic for Sunday. You could even make up a game about these rules, just to find out if there are any unfortunate mothers who didn't know at least one of them or who may have even (horror of horrors!) violated one of them! It should make the party a lot more interesting. Now, why couldn't Dr. Carmona publicize this list some other time of they year? Why couldn't he talk about the health issues of mothers and how to help mothers in general? And what on earth will he talk about on Fathers' Day... And do you know how he ends this diatribe? He says:
Is this man for real? ---- Via Ann Chuckling. |
Ssssaturday!
I have written a long post in praise of secularism on the American Street. Go there and tell how to think about the topic better. Of course, only if you are interested in saving the world. Maybe I shouldn't write that a post is long? It could be a damper. What if we pretend that I said it was a very short post with lots of sexy pictures, too? Or that at least it is mostly waffle? Choices, choices. |
Friday, May 06, 2005
Friday Embroidery Blogging
|
Today's Action Alert
Today's Action is based on an email from the DNC: Can you imagine what Republicans would say if a liberal went on national television and said that conservative judges are a greater threat than terrorism? Or that Clarence Thomas was a Commie? Or that 9-11 was no big deal? They would be (as my old boss Bill Clinton used to say), "squealing like a pig stuck under a gate." But when Pat Robertson spouts this nonsense, what do we hear from his fellow Republicans? Thundering silence. What's worse, Sen. George Allen of Virginia, Robertson's home state, apparently thinks now is a good time to deliver the commencement address to the ultraconservative graduate school Robertson founded. Allen should know better. He should be repudiating Robertson and his hate speech, just as John McCain did in the 2000 GOP primaries. Then again, we saw what the far right did to McCain when he had the guts to take them on. So Allen is headed to Robertson's graduation cookout. I guess that’s just the sort of payback Robertson expects after saying Allen "would make a tremendous president" on national TV and giving the maximum allowable contribution to Allen’s most recent campaign. When George Allen lends legitimacy to Robertson's offensive rhetoric and Bill Frist joins the Family Research Council's "Democrats hate God" telecast, it just proves how far Senate Republicans will go to pander to the right wing fringe. Contact Senator Allen and ask him not to speak at Robertson's graduation. Thanks for taking today's action! |
Friday Dog Blogging
Thursday, May 05, 2005
WOW!
Driplets
Is that a word? If it isn't I declare ownership of it. Driplets are these multiple things that ooze out when I try to write something serious that takes effort and stewing and time. They are trivialities or significant mantras or both. Here are a few that have been buzzing around my head today: -What is nucular? Is it the opposite of secular? Like in the "nucular option"? -Who let out the "air" from Tony Bl***? -What is "a woman's woman" like? Does she even exist? There is something called "a man's man", like a higher type of a man. Isn't there? Isn't there? |
Fair and Balanced Reporting by Echidne
It is time for me to stop being a lefty propagandist and to adopt the mature approach of the mainstream media to events in this world. For instance, the way to address ethics violations is to show that both sides are equally guilty. So here I go: First, John Kerry paid parking tickets and Red Sox tickets from his campaign funds! The scoundrel! Here are the details:
Aren't you glad that we didn't elect this unethical man to run our country? Second, the Republicans do it, too, of course:
See? It all balances out. |
Masculinity in Jesusland
For one thing, you can't donate sperm if you are a gay man. Who knows where that penis has been:
Might this all be a fear of gayness being inheritable? Hmmh? Our dear Reverend James Dobson (who is going to be the head mullah when we get theocracy set up properly here) doesn't believe in inheritability here, which is a little shocking to me. He thinks that boys need to be made into heterosexual men by showing what an achievement masculinity is! (Femininity, on the other hand, requires only a lot of submission training). This is how you bring up a son:
So cute, isn't it? I'm learning so much about Jesusland today. It's making me a teeny bit worried. |
Meanwhile, in Jesusland
This is a quick runthrough of the most recent Southern Baptist -type developments in Jesusland. First, Wiccans can't read invocations at the meetings of a Virginia county:
Indeed. What else can we possibly need than the god of the Old Testament, the blood-thirsty, jealous and punishing one? Read more about this by Amanda on Pandagon where I got it from. Second, David Brooks has wet dreams about the evangelicals:
The wet dreams explanation is my attempt to be polite, for otherwise I should point out that Brooks is lying and stuff. Third, the wingnut women have their own website (via World O'Crap) in which they can spout all artistic. Here is a lovely little poem for Mother's Day:
Wow! I have to retire from the business of bad poetry. I have been so beaten! |
Weary of War?
According to the recent USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll Americans are growing weary of the Iraq war. I'm growing weary of the growing weary of the Americans. If you get my meaning. In any case, now fifty-seven percent of those questioned say that the war wasn't worth it. Wasn't worth what? And still forty-one percent think that it was worth it, whatever the "worth it" might be. What is it that these people think we are doing in Iraq? Spreading freedom and democracy to the dark continent? Securing oil for our SUVs? Punishing the Iraqis for what the Saudis did to us on 9/11 2001? Making a flytrap in our neighbor's yard so that the flies (or terrorists) end up there and get killed there (together with lots of the neighbors) instead of bothering us at home? Yes, I am growing weary of all of this. I'd love to go to sleep for a few centuries and then wake up to read all about this era in the historical records. But then I just might wake up in Gilead and find that reading is illegal for us womenfolk. |
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Sinuses
It's no accident that sinuses start with "sin". What do we need them for, anyway? Mine seem to think that it's to produce the most vivid red and green grouting material. I don't recall ever before having a sinus infection in May, feeling dizzy and showing red welts on the arms, wanting to sleep for twenty-four hour spans and so on. Maybe this is one of those signs that the universe is finally revolting against the Bush Reich? Like locusts and earthquakes. Add to that congested goddesses. This one is going to see the quacks tomorrow. The only reason I'm mentioning this (other than for the totally pure motive of whining) is to explain why my writing might seem a bit porridgey and smelly for a while: it is sharing the space with those red-and-green clumps. |
A Shocker?
Is Pohl another activist judge? Heh:
I think the judge was right. The whole thing smells of a protection scheme for the higher-ups. |
A Group Picture of the Wingnuts
![]() They were demonstrating against what they view as the liberal media. It's nice to see all of them, isn't it? |
What We Didn't Know
About all these wars. Well, we did know, perhaps. At least some of us. Bush attacking Iraq after bin Laden attacked the U.S. was nonsensical from day one, unless one assumed that the plan to invade Iraq had been in the works for a very long time indeed. Which it had, of course, as we now know from the newly revealed documents that are hurting poodle Blair in the U.K.. Bush cannot be touched by any of this, it seems. This is because he has a funny wife, and must therefore not be a monster, after all. But the British are not so easily distracted by funny wives or runaway brides:
Then there is the U.S. case of Pat Tillman:
But we didn't know! Nobody knew anything of importance, not Bush, not Rumsfed, not those in authority at Abu Ghraib. Look over there! A runaway bride! Mmm, yes. Much more interesting than the total extent of today's carnage in Iraq. It's the post-reality era, gals and guys! |
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
John Tierney
![]() John Tierney inherited William Safire's column in the New York Times. Safire is a wingnut and so is Tierney, of course. It's an old and important tradition of liberal tolerance to give all the best column space in the Times to right-wingers who can't write. In fact, it looks like this tradition is slowly turning into giving almost all the column space to wingnuts. That way the liberals look truly unbiased and fair. What could possibly be fairer than rolling over, baring your stomach and directing the attacker's teeth to the largest vein? Or this is how I first saw the hiring of John Tierney. He's a clone of the babbling David Brooks. Neither can write. Both think that their task in the world is to push the arrogant faces of the coastal liberal elites into the backsides of what they call the real America or the red states. You know, where the people who matter live. Both Brooks and Tierney act like tour guides on some safari, full of poorly disguised contempt towards the tourists who have hired them, making up stuff as the tour progresses and leading the group to all sorts of dead-ends. But then it occurred to me that maybe this is really a cunning plot! Maybe the Times is carefully hand-picking clumsy wingnut writers with nothing interesting to say to keep its readers angry and liberal! Nah. |
A Stolen Quote
I nicked this one from SWR in the Eschaton comments. It's just so perfect for describing the differences in the way the U.S. and the British media treat the leaders of the respective countries:
|
The Lefty Feminist Echidne
I was linked to on Slate:
It's naturally proper for my divine opinions to gain wider readership (assuming someone reads the Slate), but my reaction to being defined as a lefty feminist was very odd. I had to go out and walk in the woods to think about it for a while and to ask the trees for some advice. This lefty feminist Echidne of the Snakes is some other goddess, someone on the barricades with one breast showing, someone quoting from Mao's Little Red Book. Or so it seemed to me. You see, I am normal. I have the right opinions on everything which means that I must be in the center and others are too right or too left. Likewise, to be defined as a feminist implies that others are not so. I refuse to think that very many people support unequal opportunities for or worth of men and women, though of course I know that this is the optimistic view. Still, the impression I get from the quote above is that my being a feminist is somehow marking me as an oddball. It could be that I'm just oversensitive and read too much into it all. But it's the lefty bit that really troubled me. I have never even voted for a socialist candidate in any elections! I advocate a mixed economy! I like the idea of laws that protect workers and ban discrimination, but I have never argued for any banning of capitalist activities. Yes, I am indeed a lefty in the United States, but what does this say about the way we define the political dimensions? Attila the Hun is seen to be middle-of-the-road, that's what it says. None of this is of any interest to anyone but me. Except that it shows how self-definition is not the same thing as societal definitions. It's the societal definitions that determine how others react to us, and usually certain groups have much more power in naming than others. The political correctness debacle was all about the right to name and the content of the labels that are given. The powerful won it by using ridicule (some of it earned) and the fear of hierarchies turned upside-down. Thus, they still have the right to name, not those on the lower ladders of the hierarchy. The hegemony is not as total as it once was, and the blogosphere is a good example of the variations now possible. Many of us call the extreme right wingnuts, for example, at least among each other. As they are in power this is kind of exhilarating, cheeky and even a little dangerous. But the term has no mainstream relevance. On the other hand, the originally quite neutral term "liberal" is widely viewed as one of the worst things a politician in the U.S. can be called. This shows how strong the power of naming can be. |
A Contest
This is something I had in my mailbox: Hello, Today marks the beginning of Chastity Awareness Week in Pennsylvania and NARAL Pro-Choice America has an activity for your readers to keep their minds sparkling clean. President Bush has recently asked Congress to provide more funding for his abstinence-only until marriage programs. Despite the fact that study after study has shown that these very programs are ineffective and even harmful for our kids, Bush has decided to yet again offer us the latest in medieval birth control: Chastity! What's in these "abstinence-only until marriage" curricula? Slogans like: * Pet Your Dog, Not Your Date! * Don't Be a Louse, Wait For Your Spouse! * Would you want a cookie that someone had already taken a bite out of? These slogans might be out-of-date but that hasn't stopped President Bush from providing federal funding – your tax dollars – to buy them to teach our kids. I do hope you will participate in this contest - your chastity may very well be at stake! To enter, please send an email to GiveUsRealChoices@gmail.com. We will announce the contest winner on May 7th. Sincerely, Amelia Field GiveUsRealChoices.org |
Today's Action Alert
Today's Action comes from NARAL: Next week, May 2-6, Members of Congress are high-tailing it out of Washington for a late spring recess. Will your senators join Tom DeLay for a "non-lobbyist-funded" trip to an exotic destination? Or will they actually come back to your state to meet with you - their constituents? Maybe we're old-fashioned, but we believe that our elected officials should go back to their home states to meet with voters one-on-one. It seems that this group of senators disagrees. During last month's congressional recess we couldn't track many of them down - forget about locating a public town hall meeting! Perhaps these "missing in action" senators didn't want to be questioned on issues like the nuclear option. We're hearing that Sen. Frist could launch the nuclear option as soon as the Senate returns from recess, making next week even more important for activists to speak out. The nuclear option would effectively eliminate the filibuster and end pro-choice senators' chances for blocking Bush's anti-choice nominees. The good news is that the vast majority of Americans stand with us - a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that 66 percent of Americans oppose changing Senate rules. This recess, don't let senators play hide and seek while President Bush and Sen. Frist have the future of the Supreme Court in their crosshairs! Track down your senators! * Let your senators know you're keeping an eye on them next week - and that you want them to talk with voters about the nuclear option. * Visit your senators during the recess next week. Check your local newspaper or visit your senators' websites for dates and times of town hall meetings. Or call your senators' offices at 202.224.3121 to schedule a personal appointment with your senators for you and your pro-choice friends. * If you can't catch up with your senators, get creative and have fun! Get your friends to write a brief, personal note opposing the nuclear option, then deliver your notes to the senators' office nearest you with a bag of atomic fire ball candy. Thanks for taking today's action. |
Monday, May 02, 2005
IOKIYAR
It's Ok If You Are Republican. Even possibly advocating the overturning of the American Constitution. Pat Robertson just did this, too. This one radical extremist cleric is taking over my blog. Help! Someone in the government, someone in the media, someone sane anywhere in the world, help! Notice that this lunatic is a lunatic and cut off his preferential treatment to all good media perks. No, Americans are not that fringey. No, you are not going to lose your cushy livelihood if you point out that he is raving mad:
Note that Article 6. of the Constitution explicitly bans any kind of religious test for judges. But even if Robertson didn't mean to literally require that candidates should not be Muslims, his argument makes no sense. Remember that we are right now in the big wingnut push to have more religious judges in the Supreme Court? Well, wouldn't fundamentalist Muslim judges be just the sort of people Robertson is looking for? People of the book, interpreting things strictly on religious grounds and so on? Gah. All he wants is a Robertsonian Gilead where everybody thinks just like Pat. Which is a world where nobody thinks at all. ---- Via Americablog. |
Another Reason to Emigrate...
The Reverend Pat Robertson:
Is there something like Godwin's Law about whoever first mentions Al Qaeda in a net conversation? If there is, it wouldn't apply to truly lunatic cases like this extreme radical cleric. Funny how he can't see that he has more in common with bin Laden's ideas than those of most any ordinary American. |
A Garden of A Sort
My garden was of air. Do not come so near. The children cannot hear the arrival of the fear. You are a bee, you sting. I never learned to sing. The children cannot flee the stinging of the bee. My garden was of air. Yet I could not leave. The children cannot bear the adulthood of grief. I never named this thing. I never learned to sing. The children cannot tell their garden is a hell. |
Fairer and Balanceder....The New PBS
The New York Times reports about the man behind the curtain at the new and improved Public Broadcasting Service, one Mr. Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, the chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Mr. Tomlinson wants to make the PBS fairer and more balanced. I agree with him. It would be nice to have the same number of liberal and lefty interviewees as those from the wingnut side. But this is not where Mr. Tomlinson sees problems. Rather, he thinks the PBS is a vile left-wing plot, the beating heart of the so-called liberal media, the oppressor of all things right and wingnutty, and he wants to stop this horrible state of affairs. Which he can handily do. He is in power. So what does Mr. Tomlinson plan? Here is a hint:
The article I quote from is full of references to people who no longer work for the PBS. I think that Mr. Tomlinson is doing some spring cleaning... You might be interested in learning that the board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting has only three non-Republican members out of a total nine. Why is this seen as fairly balanced? But of course it is. Mr. Tomlinson's idea of balance is to get rid of voices like Bill Moyers' and to make sure that no anti-government investigative journalism will be performed in the future. And this clarifies his views even further:
It's funeral time for PBS. Every program will now be toothcombed for liberal nits, except for the wholly wingnut programs which will be assumed to be fair and balanced by their very nature. Tomlinson will pay for secret studies to see if Sesame Street advocates homosexuality or contains too little praying and so on. And people like bow-tie Tucker Carlson and the Wall Street capitalists will roam around freely. The New York Times article doesn't say this, of course. It is oh-so-polite and advocates a wait-and-see attitude in the hope that the wingnuts will be friendly and fair and balanced. But we all know what will really happen. The Fox news are not enough for the wingnuts, Scarborough Country does not suffice. No, what is needed is a totally wingnut media without a single breathing hole left for those of us who actually think. Of course, the PBS has never been especially left-wing. Only extreme wingnuts think so. But it has covered controversial issues and it has offered more thoughtful coverage than the average corporate-controlled newsmill. I think that all this will now be in the past. Limbaugh will be so pleased. |
Sunday, May 01, 2005
Spring is Coming!
|
From the Barricades
Did you know that you are a survivor of the abortion holocaust? This is the language of some pro-lifers. Imagine us as embryos: darting about, fleeing the evil abortionist or whatever, somehow miraculously surviving to the point after which pro-lifers no longer care about us: the birth. Pro-lifers seem to view women as aquaria: some empty, but with water that must be kept clear for future fishes, some with fish already in them and some all dry and dusty, no longer useful at all. A thirteen-year old in state custody in Florida is one of those aquaria with fish. She is more than thirteen weeks pregnant. She got pregnant after running away from the state home. The girl herself wants an abortion and her state-appointed custodian was helping her to get one until higher powers-that-be decided to intervene. The pro-life plot is to keep the case in court until abortion is too late. Giving birth is considerably more dangerous for a girl of this age than getting an abortion, but the case isn't about her, of course; it's about the rights of the fetus. Even though this can be clothed as a desire to properly punish the girl and whoever she had sex with:
The argument that this girl is too immature to make a decision about abortion is an odd one. She is supposedly mature enough to give birth and possibly to mother a child. And in court she sounded pretty mature to me:
and
Writing about this case makes me feel nauseous. This thirteen-year old child should be protected, should be allowed to have a childhood, should never have been in a situation where she got pregnant in the first place. We didn't care enough about her until she got pregnant. Then some of us care an enormous amount about her uterus but not at all about the rest of her. --- Second link originally from Feministing. |
Quote of the Day
This is a verry interesting one, by Laura Bush at the White House correspondents' annual dinner on Saturday:
A joke, of course. What else could it possibly be? |




